The gloomy war

Devastation after the NATO air strike in the city of Sabratha dated 20 / 6. 

Three months after the military launched Operation Dawn Odyssey attacked Libya with thousands of air strikes with speed and scale of increasingly fierce, but the Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) is not can break the fighting forces loyal to leader Muammar Gaddafi and did not help rebels gain the upper hand in battle. The fact that the West is facing is rated as troubled as the internal problems from NATO.
The biggest rift in the Western military alliance as obvious as Foreign Minister of Italy, on 22-6, suddenly the calls for "immediate cease" hostile actions in Libya. The call stunned cause NATO member countries are given in the context of the leaders of this organization has decided to prolong the war further 3 months. It shows confidence in air strikes to "protect civilians" of NATO with the support of the United States has shaken many countries are devoted to an acceleration in the war, is costly.
Nothing to argue in terms of the balance of power right from the first shot broke the French opened the war in Libya, one can see clearly that the Western coalition forces overwhelm the power compared to what the General Colonel M. Gaddafi holds. However, even thousands of continuous raids against key targets of Libya during the 99 days, although many military base commander with the intelligence center of "the enemy" were destroyed, NATO still have "mortification" M. President Gaddafi looked calmly sat playing chess between the capital Tripoli.
In fact, under fire from the NATO no-fly zone only insurgents balance of forces can not crush the army of Colonel M. Gaddafi. The standoff lasted Libya is pushing into a scenario where the Western alliance is not expected. It was this North African country will be divided with half of the western territory controlled by the military government and the eastern half held by the rebels. While still not lift his legs from both Iraq and Afghanistan quagmire, the long-term military involvement in a third country is not a bright prospect for NATO, especially at a time when many countries of the This is the headache problem, "Rice Rice shirt money."
Hopefully get a benefit from military intervention campaign in Libya have not seen where, NATO faced the most criticism from launching an attack on this country. People in the country to war can not impatiently before the terrible cost of each day due to team up to raise the aircraft and modern military weaponry in the campaign. Fog in the land, the amount of activities in Libya are becoming hot topics when the Ministry of Defence has admitted into war London the past few months about 400 million dollars - many times more than initially anticipated. A similar situation is happening with allies on the other side of the Atlantic. Uncle Sam's role in Libya has become a controversial issue at the Capitol Hill when the Pentagon was burning about $ 1 billion for the war away from America nearly halfway around the world.
Meanwhile, world opinion expressed discontent when NATO repeatedly mistakenly killed civilians, including babies toddlers, while this is what this army claims to protect. And yet, even NATO and insurgents in Libya also contradict each other about the political deadlock. Besides anger because of the services' military forces have fired her, "" land partnership "NATO's ongoing criticism within the organization funding for the overthrow President at M Gaddafi.Trong NATO can not win "from heaven", the rebels seemed hard won advantage on the ground, the firm of M. President Gaddafi and loyal army of supporters are making plans to remove these older leaders with a internal coup in danger of bankruptcy. The choice of NATO is not much.
One option provides the ability to change the world's fastest long been mentioned that NATO troops launched in Libya. However, this goes against the 1973 resolution of the Security Council United Nations and broke sharply in a different war with incalculable consequences.